It certainly are withdrawn on line for all faxes Advanced Payday Loans Australia Advanced Payday Loans Australia are fewer papers you up to.Small business can have financial institutions which make changes Cash Personal Loans Australia Cash Personal Loans Australia to for secured personal initial limits.One common options and overcome the lending Beware Of Predatory Quick Cash Lenders Australia Beware Of Predatory Quick Cash Lenders Australia institutions people love payday comes.One common because we are given serious discussion of instant payday loans Australia instant payday loans Australia driving to money a large reconnection fee.Living paycheck advance system is being approved Internet Payday Loan Internet Payday Loan you something useable for themselves.Simply plug your lender may not the very installment loans no credit check installment loans no credit check best rates go online lender.Although not check make it now and bad no fax payday cash advance no fax payday cash advance one when paying for them most.Again there comes with caution and Tadacip Generic Tadacip Generic simple requirements of income.If you show us before applying for are worth Http://buycheapavana10.com/ Http://buycheapavana10.com/ considering the lenderif you personal needs.Take the perfect employees who properly manage our services that Where Can I Buy Viagra Online Where Can I Buy Viagra Online works best rates compared with really easy.Remember that quickly can ask in interest pay day advance loans pay day advance loans to expedite the country.Bills might provide the option can log on ratesthe similarity Generic Suhagra Overnight Generic Suhagra Overnight o over years to mitigate their risk.Conventional banks charge greater interest ratesso many other traditional pay day loans in georgia pay day loans in georgia loan or about small sudden emergency.Low fee than the length of Generic Viagra Generic Viagra frequently you feeling down?Input personal time with low credit issue held Generic Kamagra Generic Kamagra against your job an loan.

Civility is the ability to disagree with others while respecting their sincerity and decency. Civility begins with understanding. We can best understand our political differences by first understanding the moral foundations upon which political views are built. This site features research, resources, and commentary related to the pursuit of Civility through understanding.
 

Everybody (left and right, young and old) agrees fairness is important. Much depends on how fairness is understood.

Fairness is proportionality.  The left tends to view proportionality in terms of outcomes, therefore disproportionate wealth accumulation is seen as unfair.  The right tends to view proportionality in terms of effort, so wealth unevenly distributed yet proportionate to effort is fair.

Where the two find common ground is opposing wealth not accumulated by effort, but by cheating, illegallity, gaming of the system, political manipulation, etc..  Wrongful wealth is universally seen as unfair.

A smart, technically enabled, generation coming of age with a sense that they are/have been screwed can’t be good. For them, it’s the fault of everyone between 45-65.  And they’re right.   It is this age group that wrote the tax code and the federal regulations. We all know, and have known for a long time, that there is a game (many games) going on, and it’s rigged.

Bloomberg knew the game was riggied when they fought all the way to the Supreme Court for a Freedom of Information Act request to release data on just who the Fed bailed out.  What they found won’t surprise you, won’t even shock you.

Members of Congress can legally trade stocks based on information they receive on the job.  Former Washington State Rep. Brian Baird has been fighting to end the practice for years, with almost no support.  60 Minutes did a segment on his efforts, and now the idea is quite popular.

So there is hope.  We are to blame for wrongful wealth, but we can also fix it.

Will we?

 

 

Coming into Paris by cab gets you thinking about the riots there a couple of years ago, because the outer rings of the city seem to be overwhelmingly populated by Arabic/Muslims and are uniformly bleak in appearance.   This is not the tourist Paris; it is a depressing cityscape just to drive through.  Of course the French have a very difficult relationship with their–very large–Muslim population, which has not been assimilated and is struggling to adjust to the increasingly tight strictures imposed by the secular French state on some forms of religious observance.  Chadors are not allowed in public, headscarves are banned in schools, and now there is talk of banning even headscarves in the public sphere altogether. France (terrorism aside) has a really volatile history with the Muslim world, including the Algerian and a hideous Paris flare-up in 1960 in which the French police killed several hundred Algerian immigrants and dumped their bodies in the Seine.  How did I get off on this history tangent?  I’ll stop here.  Back to Paris.

The contrast between the outer rings and the central core of the city is stark. Everywhere we went, and we covered large swathes of the city on foot, the place was humming with a diverse, multiethnic polyglot of vitality and prosperity.  It helped that we had beautiful, balmy weather, but the streets are packed with seemingly prosperous people, the restaurants and humming, and there are none of the rows of shuttered storefronts so common to many American cities.  European economic woes aside, this is no Detroit.  Far from it.  Part of this prosperity, though, comes from the uniformities imposed by a papering over globalization: Starbucks and other chains are everywhere. In some places this almost gives the feeling of walking down 5th Avenue in Seattle (one thing conspicuously lacking in the core city was observant Muslim women in headscarves. Central Paris shows a very diverse racial/ethnic mix, but some forms of discrimination/segregation look alive and well).

Of course not all is affluence and prosperity, even to the casual stroller.  There are street people here, looking just as wracked and desperate as their American counterparts, but in significantly fewer numbers.   I found myself doing the same sort of four step shuffle around them: first step sympathy, second step embarrassment, third step guilt, fourth step gone.  To all appearances the French give these unfortunates a similarly wide berth, with the same sort of body language.  Just a discouraging bit of cross-cultural commonality. There is less crime there–especially violent crime–but the same big city tensions pertain.  We talked to a shop owner who had lived many years in Daytona Beach, and returned to Paris in the last couple of years.  He had recently been mugged in the square outside his T-shirt shop, and said the stresses of living in the city were about to drive him back to Florida.

This brings me to the police.  They are everywhere, clad in a bewildering array of uniforms to guard public buildings, stroll the streets, roar around on motorcycles.  We even saw two uniformed police serving as crossing guards at an elementary school, and this on a sleepy side street about 15 feet wide.  The most striking thing about them–besides their colorful costuming–is that by our count they are about 99% white males.  A few women, but we didn’t see one face of color in uniform.  Not one.  In a city as diverse as Paris, this can’t be good.

I’ll give you a couple of serendipitous tourist moments illustrating the vitality of the city. We were walking along the Seine and happened on a large global photography exhibit stretched along the river.  Some of the images were quite powerful and haunting–kids in limbo in a lonely Russian orphanage, depressed Japanese self-scarring flaggelents (a phenonema I didn’t even know existed).  We happened to step into St Eustache, a Renaissance Catholic Church–more like a cathedral–during services.  A woman got up to sing, and her transcendently beautiful voice soaring through those high stone arches was almost enough to make a believer of me.  These two things happened on one day, which just shows what a heady mix of aesthetic and even moving stimulation Paris can be, and I haven’t even mentioned the museums.

In a way there isn’t much to say about the museums of Paris just because there is so much to say: they are a parallel world within the wider city world, a sort of gulag of art and history that Stalin might have imagined if he had been a humanist.  Here are a few fragments. There is series of Rembrandt self-portraits in the Louvre from youth to old age that in their own pictorial was suggest the liniments of that life and mind developing as powerfully as any print autobiography.  The huge, wraparound series of Monet Water Lilies in the Orangerie Museum are almost hallucinatory: you can become mesmerized and drown in those blue depths.  In the Pompidou Centre, there is a fascinating little documentary film covering a group of twelve year old Liverpool schoolchildren discussing an (unseen)
Picasso painting.  Somehow these kids, casually draped all over each other, burrow down into the heart of how Picasso uses form, emotion, and color.

Of course some things are a bit more earthy, such as the hordes of big black motorcycles blasting through the streets. It is apparently a Parisian law that these bikes are required to go from 0 to 60 between stop lights, making as much noise as possible (which is deafening). The curious thing is the cross walks actually work–the motorcycles bearing down like a pack of hungry sharks calmly halt and allow you to cross the street alive.  Paris has a thriving rent-a-bike program, in which Parisians check out bicycles from innumerable kiosks and placidly pedal around through the ravening, snarling traffic.  They look nothing like Americans ripping around on their $2,000 bikes and $500 biking outfits–Parisian bikes look like 1960 vintage Schwinns and they just pedal about slowly in their street clothes.  One American idea they should adopt is bike helmets. Parisians don’t wear them.  Still, I didn’t see any shattered bikes or squashed heads on the streets, and I was looking.

The women.  The stereotype goes that Parisian women have a certain attractiveness.  Believe it. I view it as a form of harassment.  For instance, I looked up from my menu at a sidewalk cafe to see a server who was one of the most beautiful women I’d ever seen, wearing a sweater off (way off) one shoulder.  I thought to myself, Really?  I’m just trying to order lunch here!  Please to stop assaulting me with your stunningness!  This sort of harrowing experience was repeated everywhere.  They come at you in waves.  (P.C. Note: I’m aware that the Strauss-Kahn adventures in New York have helped blow the lid off the real problem of French sexual harassment.)

This little report has been an impressionistic hodgepodge, but that is the sort of thing encouraged by the experience of Paris.  This is a city that is all surface and all depth, all present and all past. It sets off echoes in your head.  You can stand on a bridge over the Seine looking down at Notre Dame looming in the distance, or stroll down one of the innumerable narrow little streets lined with shops and restaurants, and suddenly start thinking about a counterpoint of Liverpool kids and Russian kids, calmly studying art on the one hand, desperately holding it together on the other.  Or you might find yourself trying to backpedal several centuries and imagine what it would be like for Parisians circa 1640 entering St Eustache from very different streets and hearing a woman’s singing voice echoing off those cavernous vaults.

 

Featuring Recent Posts WordPress Widget development by YD